The equations for the LM-Aff-PureAgg-ARCH process are
and the constant g is fixed by the condition ∑χl = 1. The model has three
parameters σ∞,w∞ and α. The constant w∞ fixes the overall level of correlation
(the correlation increases with decreasing w∞), and the constant α fixes the
decrease of the lagged correlation with increasing lags. The parameter σ∞ fixes
the mean level for the volatility. The upper cut-off lmax is also an implicit
parameter in the model.
A few notes on the model
This model is essentially equivalent to the limit τ0→ 0 of the
model LM-Aff-Agg-ARCH. The remaining difference is that the
LM-Aff-Agg-ARCH process uses a logarithmic set of time horizons.
The computational time is proportional to the cut-off (whereas for the
LM-Aff-Agg-ARCH it is proportional to the log of the cut-off). This
difference makes the simulation time much (much) longer.
The model has some analytical tractability, see Borland and
Bouchaud [2005]. Models with EMAs seem more complicated.
The figures for this model is given for 2 set of parameters. The first set
corresponds to a lagged correlation decay in aggreement with the empirical
decay.
σ∞ = 0.11
w∞ = 0.10
α = 1.15
lmax = 32768
p(ϵ): Student with 5 degrees of freedom
The simulation time corresponds to 70 years with a time increment δt = 3
minutes.
References
Lisa Borland and Jean-Philippe Bouchaud. On a multi-timescale
statistical feedback model for volatility fluctuations. Preprint, 2005.
Available at: arXiv:physics/0507073.